The national doctrine for more than twenty years has discussed the objective or subjective nature of RPA. This debate, both because of its duration and because of the manifest contradiction of the positions of our authors, has made it seem that the study of RPA is limited to it and that once any of these positions is consolidated, the resulting RPA system will be fully operational. . Big mistake! Comparative law has shown us that little or nothing matters the external qualification of the RPA - objective vs. subjective - if this is not accompanied by a complete study of its budgets, which includes two complementary and successive aspects: first, determine the horizontal matrix of the RPA system, that is, the enumeration of each and every one of its budgets, and, subsequently, the vertical matrix, that is, the precise conceptual delimitation of each one of them.
Keywords:
Administrative inactivity, State Responsability, Administrative Law
Román Cordero, C. A. (2016). Administrative Inactivity and State Responsibility. Revista De Derecho Público, (67), Págs. 402–423. https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i67.41348
