¿Piensan y actúan igual al juez constitucional y el profesor de derecho constitucional?

Gustavo Zagrebelsky

doi:10.5354/rdpu.v0i73.35625

The Public Law Journal of the Universidad de Chile invites national and foreign authors to participate in the next issue of the Journal, corresponding to the second semester of 2024.

Articles must conform to the editorial guidelines, which can be found at: https://revistaderechopublico.uchile.cl/index.php/RDPU/about/submissions

The papers are subjected to a blind peer review process.

Do the constitutional judge and the constitutional law professor think and act the same?

Authors

Gustavo Zagrebelsky Universidad de Turín

No. 73 (2010): 2do semestre

https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i73.35625

Abstract

The author exposes the contradictions between the perspective of the constitutional judge and that of the professor of constitutional law, characterized by the emphasis on practice in one and theory in the other. He proposes a formula of balance between both in pursuit of the enrichment of constitutional justice.

Keywords:

Constitutional law, Judge, Professor, Constitutional justice, Theory, Practice, Doctrine, Jurisprudence

Downloads

Altmetrics

How to Cite

Zagrebelsky, G. (2014). Do the constitutional judge and the constitutional law professor think and act the same?. Revista De Derecho Público, (73), Págs. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i73.35625

Do the constitutional judge and the constitutional law professor think and act the same?

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

Downloads

Make a Submission

Language

Information

Current Issue

indexado

publique

espacio